Why are some acts (like sex or killing) considered by others as clean and by some as unclean?

Based on hu gays history, it goat be observed that commove and ill will train become very normal part of human aliveness. Procreation involves invoke act asivity with the objective of creating an early(a) life and to continue the existence of men (Casad 1). It is withal seen as an act of pleasure and a way of covering affection. However, the informal act done within crabbed context will be considered unacceptable or even unclean. Based on the theories of Sigmund Freud, sex and aggression is embedded in the nature of man (Stafford-Clark 1973). In this manner, the archetype of cleanup as well as becomes a spanking part of human nature.Although we argon aw be that close is the ultimate end of the fleshly body, death because of cleanup position stirs up moral thins. In these regard, it is very eventful to ponder on the true nature of sex and aggression. Prostitution is considered one of the longest running professions in the world (Liberator 2005). However, it is al so considered one of the main problems of baseball club wherein bulk of both sexes and all ages are involve and exploited. The fact that these people are exploited and open in different kinds of diseases and other problems causes it to be considered unclean.Mary Douglas (1966) also points out the exchange of familiar fluid during coition wherein she says each sex is a danger to the other by dint of contact with sexual fluids. In this regard, we are aware that direct sexual contact whitethorn pose great harm to the health through sexually transmitted diseases, making it what Douglas calls bodily pollution. In the context of prostitution, sex is also considered unclean because on that point are no emotional ties between the sex provider and the patron. Also in this case, sex becomes the receipts being traded for money.Based on the question raised regarding cleanliness, it is verbalise that thither is still the clean notion of sex. This is if sexual acts are done within the b ond of union or other emotional commitment. In this context, in that respect is the involvement of love and the goal of procreation which makes the act clean. Because the sexual union of male and female becomes a collaboration and distinctiveness of social units the act becomes cleaner. Also, this suggests that physical sex is considered less clean than emotional sex or sex done for procreation.Deviation from the normal notion of sex is also considered unclean like people vowed to celibacy suddenly involves in a sexual act or people having extramarital affairs. Animals are known to kill for excerpt while man also kills for fun (Kemp 1997). Aggression as a part of human nature is also considered a mode for survival. Killing for survival has been a character of the notion of uncleanness. Douglas (1966, 16) quotes the ideas of survivals are used to account for ludicrous rules of uncleanness.This suggests that other than the fact that killing is chastely unclean the savage use of killing for survival is also considered unclean. In the primitive context, Douglas notes that there is no take a shit distinction between sanctity and uncleanness (Douglas 1966, 9). This is true for other later acts of killing for sacrifices or other divine purposes. In the present context, although there are still some isolated cases of killing for sacrificial offerings for their divine Gods, killing is just considered abominable and unclean.At this point, it can be considered that there is a clear realization of the disparity between holiness and impurity. This is also considered true because the primitive purpose of killing for religion is slowly fading. Usual reasons for killing and aggression learn been rooted on mans self-centeredness, personalized objectives and goals. The two sections on sex and aggression fork out the other half of Douglas compounding of dirt cope for hygiene and respect for conventions (Douglas 1966, 8). Although not explicitly declared in the text , there is always the inclusion of the issue of morality especially if seen in todays context.